|

Krishnamurti
DVD's
Krishnamurti
Books
Krishnamurti
CD's
More
Krishnamurti Articles
Krishnamurti
Australia Home |
Freedom and Authority
Freedom
implies dropping the bondage of the past, abandoning authority, exploring
relationships in the present. The following quotations from Krishnamurti may be
found relevant......If I were foolish enough to give you
a system and if you were foolish enough to follow it, you would
merely be copying, imitation, conforming, accepting, and when you
do that you have set up in yourself the authority of another and
hence there is conflict between you and that authority. You feel
you must do such and such a thing because you have been told to
do it and yet you are incapable of doing it. You have your own
particular inclinations, tendencies and pressures which conflict
with the system you think you ought to follow and therefore there
is a contradiction. So you will lead a double life between the
ideology of the system and the actuality of your daily existence.
In trying to conform to the ideology, you suppress
yourself--whereas what is actually true is not the ideology but
what you are. If you try to study yourself according to another
you will always remain a second-hand human being.
A man who says, "I want to change,
tell me how to", seems very earnest, very serious, but he is
not. He wants an authority whom he hopes will bring about order
in himself. But can authority ever bring about inward order? You
may see the truth of this intellectually but can you actually
apply it so that your mind no longer projects any authority, the
authority of a book, a teacher, a wife or husband, a parent, a
friend or of society? Because we have always functioned within
the pattern of a formula, the formula becomes the ideology and
the authority; but the moment you really see that the question,
"How can I change?" sets up a new authority, you have
finished with authority for ever.
Let us state it again clearly: I see that
I must change completely from the roots of my being; I can no
longer depend on any tradition because tradition has brought
about this colossal laziness, acceptance and obedience; I cannot
possibly look to another to help me to change, not to any
teacher, any God, any belief, any system, any outside pressure or
influence. What then takes place?
Freedom
implies dropping the bondage of the past, abandoning authority, exploring
relationships in the present. The following quotations from Krishnamurti may be
found relevant.
.....If I were foolish enough to give you
a system and if you were foolish enough to follow it, you would
merely be copying, imitation, conforming, accepting, and when you
do that you have set up in yourself the authority of another and
hence there is conflict between you and that authority. You feel
you must do such and such a thing because you have been told to
do it and yet you are incapable of doing it. You have your own
particular inclinations, tendencies and pressures which conflict
with the system you think you ought to follow and therefore there
is a contradiction. So you will lead a double life between the
ideology of the system and the actuality of your daily existence.
In trying to conform to the ideology, you suppress
yourself--whereas what is actually true is not the ideology but
what you are. If you try to study yourself according to another
you will always remain a second-hand human being.
A man who says, "I want to change,
tell me how to", seems very earnest, very serious, but he is
not. He wants an authority whom he hopes will bring about order
in himself. But can authority ever bring about inward order? You
may see the truth of this intellectually but can you actually
apply it so that your mind no longer projects any authority, the
authority of a book, a teacher, a wife or husband, a parent, a
friend or of society? Because we have always functioned within
the pattern of a formula, the formula becomes the ideology and
the authority; but the moment you really see that the question,
"How can I change?" sets up a new authority, you have
finished with authority for ever.
‘Let us state it again clearly: I see that
I must change completely from the roots of my being; I can no longer depend on
any tradition because
First of all, can you reject all
authority? If you can it means that you are no longer afraid.
Then what happens? When you reject something false which you have
been carrying about with you for generations, when you throw off
a burden of any kind, what takes place? You have more energy,
havent you? You have more capacity, more drive, greater
intensity and vitality. If you do not feel this, then you have
not thrown off the burden, you have not discarded the dead weight
of authority.
But when you have thrown it off and have
this energy in which there is no fear at all--no fear of making a
mistake, no fear of doing right or wrong--then is not that energy
itself the mutation? We need a tremendous amount of energy and we
dissipate it through fear but when there this energy which comes
from throwing off every form of fear, that energy itself produces
the radical inward revolution. You do not have to do a thing
about it.
So you are left with yourself, and that
is the actual state for a man to be who is very serious about all
this; and as you are no longer looking to anybody or anything for
help, you are already free to discover. And when there is
freedom, there is energy; and when there is freedom it can never
do anything wrong. Freedom is entirely different from revolt.
There is no such thing as doing right or wrong when there is
freedom. You are free and from that centre you act. And
hence there is no fear, and a mind that has no fear is capable of
great love. And when there is love it can do what it will.
Freedom From the Known,
pp. 17-19.
.....I think we should also consider the
question of authority. You know what authority is; but do you
know how authority comes into being? The government has
authority, has it not? There is the authority of the State, of
the law, of the policeman and the soldier. Your parents and your
teachers have a certain authority over you, they make you do what
they think you ought to do--go to bed at a certain time, eat the
right kind of food, meet the right kind of people. They
discipline you, do they not? Why? They say it is for your own
good. Is it? We will go into that. But first we must understand
how authority arises--authority being coercion, compulsion, the
power of one person over another, of the few over the many or the
many over the few.
Because you happen to be my father or
mother, have you a right over me? What right has anyone to treat
another like dirt? What do you think creates authority?
First, obviously, there is the desire on
the part of each one of us to find a safe way of behaviour; we
want to be told what to do. Being confused, worried, and not
knowing what to do, we go to a priest, to a teacher, to a parent
or to somebody else, seeking a way out of our confusion. Because
we think he knows better than we do, we go to the guru, or
to some learned man, and we ask him to tell us what to do. So, it
is the desire in us to find a particular way of life, a way of
conduct that creates authority, is it not?
Say, for instance, I go to a guru.
I go to him because I think he is a great man who knows the
truth, who knows God, and who can therefore give me peace. I
dont know anything about this for myself, so I go to him, I
prostrate myself, I offer him flowers, I give him my devotion. I
have the desire to be comforted, to be told what to do, so I
create an authority. That authority does not really exist outside
of me.
While you are young, the teacher may
point out that you do now know. But if he is all intelligent he
will help you to grow to be intelligent also; he will help you to
understand your confusion so that you do not seek authority, his
own or any other.
There is the outward authority of
the State, of the law, of the police. We create this authority
outwardly because we have property which we want to protect. The
property is ours and we dont want anyone else to have it,
so we create a government which protects what we own. The
government becomes our authority; it is our invention, to protect
us, to protect our way of life, our system of thought. Gradually,
through centuries, we establish a system of law, of
authority--the State, the government, the police, the army--to
protect me and mine.
There is also the authority of the ideal,
which is not outward but inward. When we say, "I must be
good, I must not be envious, I must feel brotherly to
everybody" we create in our minds the authority of the
ideal, do we not? Suppose I am intriguing, stupid, cruel, I want
everything for myself, I want power. That is the fact, it is what
I actually am. But I think I must be brotherly because religious
people have said so, and also because it is convenient, it is
profitable to say so; therefore I create brotherhood as an ideal.
I am not brotherly, but for various reasons I want to be, so the
ideal becomes my authority.
Now, in order to live according to that
ideal, I discipline myself. I feel very envious of you because
you have a better coat, or a prettier sari, or more
titles; therefore I say, "I must not have envious feelings,
I must be brotherly." The ideal has become my authority, and
according to that ideal I try to live. So what happens? My life
becomes a constant battle between what I am and what I should
be. I discipline myself--and the State also disciplines me.
Whether it is communist, capitalist or socialist, the State has
ideas as to how I should behave. There are those who say the
State is all-important. If I live in such a State and do anything
contrary to the official ideology, I am coerced by the
State-0-that is, by the few who control the State . . . . .
To come back: we create authority--the
authority of the State, of the police, the authority of the
ideal, the authority of tradition. You want to do something, but
your father says, "Dont do it." You have to obey
him, otherwise he will get angry, and you are dependent on him
for your food. He controls you through your fear, does he not?
Therefore he becomes your authority. Similarly, you are
controlled by tradition--you must do this and not that, you must
wear your sari in a certain way, you must not look at the
boys or at the girls. Tradition tells you what to do; and
tradition, after all, is knowledge, is it not? There are books
which tell you what to do, the State tells you what to do, your
parents tell you what to do, society and religion tell you what
to do. And what happens to you? You get crushed, you are just
broken. You never think, act, live vitally, for you are afraid of
all these things. You say that you must obey, otherwise you will
be helpless. Which means what? That you create authority because
you are seeking a safe way of conduct, a secure manner of living.
The very pursuit of security creates authority, and that is why
you become a mere slave, a cog in a machine, living without any
capacity to think, to create.
Life Ahead pp 35-38
Krishnamurti: The associations
and reactions to what is happening is the conditioning of the
mind. This conditioning prevents the observation of what is
taking place now. What is taking place now is free of time. Time
is the evolution of our conditioning. It is mans
inheritance, the burden that has no beginning. When there is this
passionate observation of what is going on, that which is being
observed dissolves into nothingness.
The observation of the anger that is taking
place now reveals the whole nature and structure of violence.
This insight is the ending of all violence. It is not replaced by
anything else and therein lies our difficulty. Our whole desire
and urge is to find a definite end. In that end there is a sense
of illusory security.
Questioner: There is a difficulty
for many of us in the observation of anger because emotions and
reactions seem inextricably part of that anger. One doesnt
feel anger without associations, content.
Krishnamurti: Anger has many
stories behind it. It isnt just a solitary event. It has,
as you pointed out, a great many associations. These very
associations, with their emotions, prevent the actual
observation. With anger the content is the anger. The
anger is the content; they are not two separate things. The
content is the conditioning. In the passionate observation of
what is actually going -- that is, the activities of the
conditioning -- the nature and structure of the conditioning are
dissolved.
Questioner: Are you saying that
when an event is taking place there is the immediate, racing
current of associations in the mind? And if one instantly sees
this starting to happen, that observation instantly stops it and
it is gone? Is this what you mean?
Krishnamurti: Yes. It is really
very simple, so simple that you miss its very simplicity and so
its subtlety. What we are saying is that whatever is happening --
when you are walking, talking, "meditation" -- the
event that is taking place is to be observed. When the mind
wanders, the very observation of it ends its chatter. So there is
no distraction whatsoever at any time.
Questioner: It seems as if you
are saying that the content of thought essentially has no meaning
in the art of living.
Krishnamurti: Yes. Remembrance
has no place in the art of living. Relationship is the art of
living. If there is remembrance in relationship, it is not
relationship. Relationship is between human beings, not their
memories. It is these memories that divide and so there is
contention, the opposition of the you and the me. So thought,
which is remembrance, has no place whatsoever in relationship.
This is the art of living.
Relationship is to all things -- to nature, the
birds, the rocks, to everything around us and above us -- to the
clouds, the stars and to the blue sky. All existence is
relationship. Without it you cannot live. Because we have
corrupted relationship we live in a society that is
disintegrating.
The art of living can come into being only when
thought does not contaminate Love.
Letters to Schools Volume One, 1st August
1977 pp.
68-71.
.....Authority and tradition may be
wrong, they may be a comforting illusion. To discover whether
that void is true or false, whether it exists or is merely
another invention of the mind, the mind must be free from the net
of authority and tradition.
"Can the mind ever free itself from
this net?"
The mind cannot free itself, for any
effort on its part to be free only weaves another net in which it
will again be caught. Freedom is not an opposite; to be free is
not to be free from something, its not a state of
release from bondage. The urge to be free breeds its own bondage.
Freedom is a state of being which is not the outcome of the
desire to be free. When the mind understands this, and sees the
falseness of tradition, then only does the false wither
away.
Commentaries on Living III,
pp.34.
...But you see, most of us are afraid to
find out for ourselves what is true and what is false, and that
is why we merely accept what somebody else says. The important
this is to question, to observe, never to accept. Unfortunately,
most of us only listen to those whom we regard as great people,
to an established authority, to the Upanishads, the Gita,
of whatever it is. We never listen to the birds, to the sound of
the sea, or to the beggar. So we miss what the beggar is saying
-- and there may be truth in what the beggar is saying, and none
at all in what is said by the rich man or the man in
authority.
Life Ahead, pp. 174.
...Discontent is the means to freedom;
but in order to inquire without bias, there must be none of the
emotional dissipation which often takes the form of political
gatherings, the shouting of slogans, the search for a guru
or spiritual teacher, and religious orgies of different kinds.
This dissipation dulls the mind and heart, making them incapable
of insight and there easily moulded by circumstances and fear. It
is the burning desire to inquire, and not the easy imitation of
the multitude, that will bring about a new understanding of the
ways of life.
The young are so easily persuaded by the
priest or the politician, by the rich or the poor, to think in a
particular way; but the right kind of education should help them
to be watchful of these influences so that they do not repeat
slogans like parrots or fall into any cunning trap of greed,
whether their own or that of another. They must not allow
authority to stifle their minds and hearts. To follow another,
however great, or to give ones adherence to a gratifying
ideology, will not bring about a peaceful world.
Education and the Significance
of Life, pp.42
|